The goal of the 2019 Student Research Competition is to assist talented students, working in groups under the guidance of a professor, to focus on a relevant research question, and create an engaging output as a response. Research proposals should directly relate to the 2019 topic of “Sustainable TallBuildings and Urban Habitat”. Proposals can come from any topic/discipline, including but not limited to: architecture, construction, energy issues, environmental engineering, façade design, financial & cost issues, fire & life safety, humanities, infrastructure, interiors, maintenance & cleaning, materials, MEP engineering, policy making, resource management, seismic, social aspects, structural engineering, systems development, urban planning, vertical transportation, wind engineering, etc.
It is up to the students to interpret the theme, and outline how their research will address it, including how the funds will be used to support the intended outcome. In fact, the ultimate objective of this award is to give the chance to students of any discipline to immerse, for the first time, in detailed, academic research, under the guidance of a professor, in a topic that the students are particularly interested and invested in.
Proposals (via the online survey, accessed here) are due by Friday May 31, 2019 (12:00 p.m. Chicago time). To express your interest in participating prior to this date, to discuss the suitability of your proposal in more detail, or to ask any questions, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please Note: The Student Research Competition is open to students under the guidance of a professor, while the CTBUH International Research Seed Funding initiative is aimed specifically at research professionals. It is therefore not possible to submit a proposal to both programs.
The award for this competition will be provided by the Funding Sponsor in the amount of $20,000, paid in two installments of $10,000. CTBUH will facilitate the transfer of funds to the appropriate university or professor involved with this project to support the students in their research activities. Please note: the budget cannot be used to cover costs to attend the CTBUH conference and collect the award, or to disseminate the findings at conferences, symposiums, etc. It needs to be used for the actual research in some way.
March 20, 2019 - Competition Formally Launched
May 31, 2019 - Submission Deadline
June 10 – July 1, 2019 - Judging Period
July 22, 2019 - Decision Communicated to Winning Team
October 28 / November 02, 2019 - Winner Announced at the CTBUH 2019 World Congress
Late 2019 / Early 2020 - Research Project Undertaken
All applications must be submitted in English. All proposals should include information/details necessary for the jury to understand the research ideas and anticipated outcomes. The award funds are intended to finance the student’s research work and may be used to cover all expenses which serve this purpose (including the necessary equipment and material, travel expenses directly related to the research itself, etc.). It may not be used to cover salaries, tuition, or indirect costs of the research, nor be used for dissemination (attending to conferences, publishing papers/books, etc.). CTBUH will assist with the dissemination of progress and findings to the international community through its normal channels – publications, website, newsletters, etc.
Applications will be accepted from either students, as individuals or groups, or PhD candidates. In both cases, a professor of the belonging faculty will act as a primary student advisor. The academic professional must represent public or private institutions that can effectively carry out the research (i.e., non-institutional, individual private submissions will not be accepted). Each student or team can submit only one research proposal. The submitter or team members do not need to be CTBUH members, however, it is expected that the award recipient(s) will become CTBUH members and get involved in the activities of the Council more generally. Team projects may have as many students that are deemed necessary, but must designate one academic professional who will serve also as the communication liaison with the CTBUH.
It’s no secret that Detroit, Michigan, is in the midst of a downtown revival after the city’s financial downfall and historic bankruptcy in 2013. The new Detroit is flourishing with new restaurants, artist spaces, small business incubators, and investment from large corporations that are pulling people back into the city.
In the latest development of Detroit’s comeback, Snøhetta will be collaborating with Ford Motor Company to re-envision and design the car company’s headquarters and campuses in both Dearborn and Detroit. Ford started its upgrade back in 2016 with plans to overhaul its existing facilities in Dearborn, the original headquarters. With the Dearborn redevelopment still on track, Ford also recently acquired a new site in its expansion: Michigan Central Station in Corktown, one of Detroit’s oldest neighborhoods. The conceptual designs for both are being led by Snøhetta, who was chosen as lead Design Architect.
Ford recently bought the Michigan Central Station, a Beaux-Arts icon that represents Detroit’s urban decline, with plans to restore and redevelop the decrepit train station. It will now serve as the central hub of the planned corporate campus in Corktown, serving both Ford employees and the general public with workspaces, restaurants, retail, and housing. The campus will also serve as an innovation hub for the future of transportation, researching urban mobility solutions including smart vehicles, roads, parking, public transit, and autonomous and electric vehicles. The new buildings and public spaces will be formulated in collaboration with the Corktown community and city officials.
Ford is one of many car companies looking to the future. With the rise of automated vehicles and increased technological capabilities, car companies are doing more than just producing cars. Ford, with the creation of its new research campuses, plans to implement the first City of Tomorrow study in Corktown, envisioning the future of mobility and rethinking existing cities.
“We at Ford want to help write the next chapter, working together in Corktown with the best startups, the smartest talent and the thinkers, engineers and problem-solvers who see things differently—all to shape the future of mobility and transportation,” Chairman Bill Ford said at the celebration of Ford’s purchase of the Michigan Central Station, as reported in Detroit Free Press.
Design and community engagement processes for the Corktown campus are just in the beginning stages, while the Dearborn campus conceptual design is expected to be completed by the end of the year.
Suffice to say, we certainly know how concrete behaves at structural level—the material has been dominating cities and skylines since Joseph Monier invented a reinforced concrete in 1889. But until now, how the material works on a microscopic level has eluded scientists.
Now, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have unearthed concrete's molecular properties, claiming their findings could lead to structural advances in the future.
Traditionally, concrete uses a mixture of gravel, sand, cement, and water. In this case, a compound known as calcium-silicate-hydrate (CSH or cement hydrate) forms when the cement powder mixes with water. It essentially causes all the ingredients to solidify and become one.
The phenomenon that has been baffling researchers many for years is whether concrete's molecular structure is comprised of continual bonds as found in stone and metal, or rather, as a sea of aggregate particle clumps bonded by (in the case of concrete) CSH.
Researchers from MIT discovered in 2012 that during the first hour of the concrete mixing process, when CSH particles form, the size at which they form is apparently random and "not in homogenous spheres." As a result, such "diversity in the size of the nanoscale units leads to a denser, disorderly packing of the particles, which corresponds to stronger cement paste."
However, the question regarding whether concrete was "considered a continuous matrix or an assembly of discrete particles" still remained. Predictably, the answer was "a bit of both."
In a press release, Roland Pellenq, a senior research scientist in MIT’s department of civil and environmental engineering explained that the particle distribution facilitated almost every gap in the molecular structure to be filled by even smaller grains. This seemingly iterative process continued to the extent that Pellenq and his peers could approximate the material as a continuous solid.
“Those grains are in a very strong interaction at the mesoscale,” said Pollenq. “You can always find a smaller grain to fit in between [the larger grains, hence] you can see it as a continuous material.”
Pollenq did however, conclude his findings by stating that concrete could never be considered a true continuous material. This is due to the fact that grains within the CSH, unlike those in metal or stone, cannot reach a resting state of minimum energy. In other words, larger molecules can cause solid concrete to "creep" which makes the material susceptible to cracking and degradation over time. "Both views are correct, in some sense,” Pellenq concluded.
In an ironic twist, the global fuel powerhouse that is the Middle East is at risk of becoming too hot for human life due to the emissions produced as a result of creating that fuel. Such news evidently means little to the city of Dubai which is currently in line for two new luxurious skyscrapers, one of which will feature its very own rainforest.
Jeremy Pal and Elfatih A. B. Eltahir recently published "Nature: Climate Change" which outlines how rising temperatures in the Persian Gulf will render the area inhospitable. The study compares a standard model of CO2 emissions over the course of 80 years to the temperatures deemed viable for human life. The more shocking news is that the research factors in mankind's predicted future efforts to curb emissions.
The climate variables that were used to determine that human life was unsupportable were complex, though Pal and Eltahir simplified it, using a measurement called "wet bulb" heat. This was described as “a combined measure of temperature and humidity, or ‘mugginess'” by which a maximum exposure time of six hours to the conditions (of 95 Fahrenheit) was stated. Anything more “would probably be intolerable even for the fittest of humans,” they noted, adding that "even the most basic outdoor activities are likely to be severely impacted.”
Toronto-based architect firm ZASA, however, has different ideas.
Situated off Sheikh Zayed Road (SZR) in Al Thanyah First, two luxury towers in exuberant Dubai style will offer nothing other than the flamboyant panache that made the city famous: the complex boasts its own rainforest and an artificial beach.
The 3.2 acre site will encompass the two, 47-story-high towers, a five storey podium, and two basement levels. Both towers will include a "sky lobby" and "sky pool." Meanwhile, the 450-room Key Hotel will offer fine dining restaurants, spa, a health club, and meeting rooms. The other tower is being called a "Serviced Apartment Tower."
ZASA says that the architecture is meant to represent contemporary life in Dubai, while the "modernist" structures utilize "active frontage" via the implementation of podiums that proportion the towers.
(h/t The New York Times for Nature: Climate Change)
Columbia University’s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, & Preservation (GSAPP) has announced the creation of a new Center for Spatial Research (CSR) that will act as a focal point linking humanities, architecture, and data science departments as well as sponsoring a series of curricular initiatives built around new technologies of mapping, data visualization and data collection. The Center will be directed by GSAPP Associate Professor Laura Kurgan.
The new center was made possible thanks to a $1,975,000 grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, a foundation that seeks to "strengthen, promote, and, where necessary, defend the contributions of the humanities and the arts to human flourishing and to the well-being of diverse and democratic societies." The development of the center responds to the contemporary influx of information available regarding geolocations, spending habits, transit, and other activities in a local population. Subsequently, the CSR intends to aid scholars and citizens in understanding what is happening in cities worldwide—past, present, and future.
The contribution means the university is now a participant in the Princeton-Mellon Initiative in Architecture, Urbanism, and the Humanities, launched in 2012. The grants seek to strengthen ties between programs in the schools of humanities and architecture with architecture studios becoming a pedagogic model for humanities, proposing large scale research on the questions that develop in dense urban environments. Such research would look into data about public health, transportation, economic activity, and demography.
“Laura’s long standing pioneering work in visualizing data as an architect, with a deep commitment to engaging social, political and environmental issues, and a unique ability to draw aesthetics and ethics together, has been a critical inspiration to our school and to the field of architecture,” Amale Andraos, GSAPP dean, said in a statement. “This new collaboration with Sharon Marcus and the humanities is an important step forward for Columbia. We are very grateful to the Mellon Foundation for its embrace of this initiative, which will contribute not only to the fields of architecture, urbanism and the humanities but to the University as a whole.”
Research by Casey J. Wichman for the think tank Resources for the Future (RFF) has found a causal relationship between bike sharing programs and traffic congestion in Washington, D.C.
In a report summary by the RFF, "findings show a reduction in DC traffic congestion of an average two to three percent that can be attributed to the presence of a Capital Bikeshare dock."
Wichman emphasizes the importance of such schemes noting its "health, environmental, and traffic congestion benefits."
Another finding was that in areas adjacent to those with bike docks, traffic congestion actually increased. Wichman hypothesized that this might be the case due to drivers possibly opting "to avoid streets populated with cyclists."
Chicago's Graham Foundation today announced nearly half a million dollars in grant funding for “groundbreaking” architectural projects by organizations, including the first major career survey of architect David Adjaye, an urban planning program in Ukraine, and architecture festivals in Norway and Portugal.
The Graham Foundation, whose director Sarah Herda sits on AN's editorial advisory board, will award $496,500 to 49 projects that “chart new territory in the field of architecture.” The award recipients were plucked from a pool of over 200 submissions representing 22 countries.
The Adjaye show, titled Making Place: The Architecture of David Adjaye, opens September 19 at the Art Institute of Chicago and will be “the only North American venue for this globally focused exhibition,” according to the Art Institute.
Other grant recipients include a plan to exhibit sound sculptures designed by Harry Bertoia at Chicago's Experimental Sound Studio, the Storefront for Art and Architecture’s biannual World Wide Storefront event, and the 2016 Oslo Architecture Triennale.
The announcement follows the Graham's “grants to individuals” program, which in May awarded $490,000 for architectural research to 63 projects.
Here's the full list of recipients, organized by category:
EXHIBITIONS [23 awards]
Art Institute of Chicago (Chicago, IL)
Chicago Design Museum (Chicago, IL)
Columbia College Chicago-Museum of Contemporary Photography (Chicago, IL)
Elmhurst Art Museum (Chicago, IL)
The Jewish Museum (New York, NY)
MAK Center for Art and Architecture, Los Angeles, at the Schindler House (West Hollywood, CA)
Materials & Applications (Los Angeles, CA)
Monoambiente (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago (Chicago, IL)
Museum of Modern Art (New York, NY)
National Trust for Historic Preservation (Washington, DC)
Oslo Architecture Triennale (Oslo, Norway)
Parasol Unit Foundation for Contemporary Art (London, England)
Serpentine Gallery (London, England)
Slought (Philadelphia, PA)
Socrates Sculpture Park (Long Island City, NY)
Southern California Institute of Architecture (Los Angeles, CA)
Swiss Institute (New York, NY)
University of California, Berkeley-Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive (Berkeley, CA)
University of Chicago-Neubauer Collegium for Culture and Society (Chicago, IL)
Video Game Art Gallery (Chicago, IL)
Yale University-School of Architecture (New Haven, CT)
FILM/VIDEO/NEW MEDIA [2 awards]
Wavelength Pictures (London, England)
The Wende Museum of the Cold War (Culver City, CA)
PUBLIC PROGRAMS [12 awards]
Archeworks (Chicago, IL)
Architectural League of New York (New York, NY)
Association of Architecture Organizations (Chicago, IL)
CANactions (Kiev, Ukraine)
Chicago Architecture Foundation (Chicago, IL)
Chicago Humanities Festival (Chicago, IL)
Experimental Sound Studio (Chicago, IL)
The Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture (Scottsdale, AZ)
Lampo (Chicago, IL)
Ohio State University-Knowlton School of Architecture (Columbus, OH)
Storefront for Art and Architecture (New York, NY)
Van Alen Institute (New York, NY)
PUBLICATIONS [12 awards]
Anyone Corporation (New York, NY)
Art Papers (Atlanta, GA)
California Institute of the Arts-REDCAT (Los Angeles, CA)
Columbia University-Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation (New York, NY)
LIGA-Space for Architecture (Mexico City, Mexico)
Lisbon Architecture Triennale (Lisbon, Portugal)
MAS Context (Chicago, IL)
Primary Information (Brooklyn, NY)
The Renaissance Society (Chicago, IL)
Rice University-School of Architecture (Houston, TX)
Walker Art Center (Minneapolis, MN)
Zone Books (Brooklyn, NY)
The Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts today announced the latest recipients of their grants to individuals, a $490,000 pot of money split among 63 projects all over the world, including an extensive photographic survey of Le Corbusier’s completed architectural works by photographer Richard Pare; a series of community-based design and urban development courses in Costa Rica; and a compilation of criticism about Berlin's Institut für Raumexperimente (Institute for Spatial Experiments).
Here's the full list of recipients, by category:
EXHIBITION [6 awards]
Zoe Beloff (New York, NY)
Gabriela Burkhalter (Basel, Switzerland)
Allied Works Architecture: Brad Cloepfil (New York, NY/Portland, OR)
Kari Cwynar (Toronto, Canada) & Kendra Sullivan (Brooklyn, NY)
Jamila Moore Pewu (Hanover, MA)
Michael Rakowitz (Chicago, IL)
FILM/VIDEO/NEW MEDIA [7 awards]
Gavin Browning, Glen Cummings & Laura Hanna (New York, NY)
Etienne Desrosiers (Montreal, Canada)
Granny Cart Productions: Elettra Fiumi & Lea Khayata (New York, NY)
Chad Freidrichs (Columbia, MO)
New-Territories/[eIf/b^t/c]: Camille Lacadée & François Roche (Bangkok, Thailand)
Léopold Lambert (Paris, France)
Candacy Taylor (Los Angeles, CA)
PUBLIC PROGRAM [3 awards]
Elizabeth Lennard (Sausalito, CA)
Marije van Lidth de Jeude & Oliver Schütte (Curridabat, Costa Rica)
Noam Toran (London, England)
PUBLICATION [33 awards]
Ethel Baraona Pohl (Barcelona, Spain), Marina Otero Verzier (Rotterdam, the
Netherlands) & Malkit Shoshan (Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
Alessandro Bava (London, England)
Silvia Benedito (Cambridge, MA) & Iwan Baan (Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
Emilia Bergmark (Malmö, Sweden), Corinne Gisel (Zürich, Switzerland) & Nina Paim (St. Gallen, Switzerland)
David Chambers & Kevin Haley (London, England)
Esther Choi (Brooklyn, NY) & Marrikka Trotter (Cambridge, MA)
Thomas Daniell (Fukuoka, Japan)
Charles L. Davis II (Charlotte, NC)
Alexander Eisenschmidt (Chicago, IL)
Institut für Raumexperimente: Olafur Eliasson (Berlin, Germany), Eric Ellingsen (Ithaca, NY) & Christina Werner (Berlin, Germany)
Didier Faustino (Paris, France)
Todd Gannon (Orange, CA) & Craig Hodgetts (Culver City, CA)
Kersten Geers, Joris Kritis (Brussels, Belgium), Jelena Pancevac (Paris, France) & Andrea Zanderigo (Milan, Italy)
Chris Grimley, Michael Kubo & Mark Pasnik (Boston, MA)
Georgina Huljich & Marcelo Spina (Los Angeles, CA)
Daniel Ibañez (Cambridge, MA), Clare Lyster (Chicago, IL), Charles Waldheim (Cambridge, MA) & Mason White (Toronto, Canada)
Catherine Ingraham (Brooklyn, NY)
Doug Jackson (San Luis Obispo, CA)
Daniel López-Pérez (San Diego, CA)
Sébastien Marot (Paris, France)
Noritaka Minami (Cambridge, MA) & Ken Yoshida (Merced, CA)
Joan Ockman (Elkins Park, PA)
Kathryn E. O’Rourke (San Antonio, TX)
Lluís Ortega (Chicago, IL)
Miriam Paeslack (Buffalo, NY)
Richard Pare (Richmond, England)
Stephen Phillips (Los Angeles, CA)
Jesse Reiser & Nanako Umemoto (New York, NY)
Charles Rice (Sydney, Australia)
Sara Stevens (Houston, TX)
Despina Stratigakos (Buffalo, NY)
Alice Twemlow (Brooklyn, NY)
Rebecca Zorach (Chicago, IL)
RESEARCH [14 awards]
Shumi Bose (London, England)
Marshall Brown (Chicago, IL)
Fabrizio Gallanti (Montreal, Canada)
David J. Getsy (Chicago, IL)
Rob Holmes (Gainesville, FL) & Brett Milligan (Davis, CA)
Sabine Horlitz (Berlin, Germany)
Andres Kurg (Tallinn, Estonia)
Tiffany Lambert (Brooklyn, NY)
Gregorio Carboni Maestri (Milan, Italy)
Mary McLeod (New York, NY)
Ara H. Merjian (New York, NY)
Meredith Miller (Ann Arbor, MI)
Spyros Papapetros (Princeton, NJ) & Gerd Zillner (Vienna, Austria)
Benedikt Reichenbach (Berlin, Germany)
The open office trend is rooted in some good ideas: encourage communication by breaking down barriers; give workers more space to breathe without confining cubicles. But a wave of new research is questioning the efficacy of the open strategy.
A lack of acoustical privacy is chief among frustrated workers’ concerns—perhaps an anxiety related to the eavesdropping implicit in an open office where workers may have to field phone calls and one-on-one meetings.
Fast Company citesa new study from the University of Sydney that found open-plan offices may come out on the losing side of the "privacy-communication trade-off.”
The Guardiansuggests the strategy's more "a cheap way of cramming more people into less space" than an effective way to encourage productivity. They cite a study in the December 2013 issue of the Journal of Environmental Psychology that found employees in private settings actually rated "ease of interaction" as better than did their open office counterparts.
In our regular Design at Work column, we’ve covered a lot of office spaces. That means we’ve also seen a lot of open floor plans: a high-tech office building in Chicago’s West Loop, Seattle's Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Groupon’s "out-there" Chicago headquarters, to name a few. We’ll be on the lookout for a shift, but for now it seems the open office may still be on the rise.
The Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts announced the recipients of their 2013 Grants to Individuals Friday. Half of the 60 international grantees were present for the awards ceremony in Chicago May 29, and were congratulated by Stanley Tigerman, a former recipient himself.
Chosen from more than 600 submissions, the winning entries were nothing if not diverse. Click through for a full list of grantees, but a brief report of a few who were in attendance:
Anthony Titus’ “Twisted Siblings” explores the relationship between modern architecture and painting, tying Daniel Libeskind to Juan Gris, Rem Koolhaas to László Moholy-Nagy and Zaha Hadid to El Lissitzky, among others.
Edwin Chan & Piero Golia designed The Chalet, a gritty Hollywood warehouse turned postmodern alpine lodge and art gallery. White oak timber blocks arranged in different patterns act as benches, blocking or amphitheater seats.
Deborah Stratman explores her fascination with sinkholes — a philosophical meditation applicable to everything from the foreclosure crisis to “metaphysical terror” itself. When something you trust, or take for granted, suddenly gives way to an interminable pit, you have one of Stratman’s “Subsurface Voids.”