The New York Times endorses The QueensWay linear park plan

Architecture City Terrain East Landscape Architecture Transportation Urbanism
The QueensWay. (Courtesy dlandstudio & WXY)

The QueensWay. (Courtesy dlandstudio & WXY)

The QueensWay has had a bumpy rollout. In October, when the Trust for Public Land and the Friends of the QueensWay unveiled their plan to transform an abandoned railway in Queens into something like the High Line, they were immediately faced with skepticism and criticism from around the city. That pro-QueensWay plan came with plenty of eye candy courtesy of splashy conceptual renderings from dlandstudio and WXY. This all got people asking why millions of dollars should be spent turning the rails into a fancy park when the rails could be refurbished to provide a useful commuter rail line.

The QueensWay. (Courtesy dlandstudio & WXY)

The QueensWay. (Courtesy dlandstudio & WXY)

But the park plan has had its champions, and the New York Times can now be counted among them. “Of the two tantalizing possibilities—rail or trail—trail now has the upper hand,” wrote the Times’ editorial board in a recent piece praising the plan. It claimed that building the QueensWay would transform “a humdrum stretch of residential-commercial-industrial-whatever with the sylvan graciousness that the High Line brought to the West Side of Manhattan, but on a far bigger scale.”

The board explained that the “rail” plan could actually be the more complicated of the two options largely because the project would have to be added onto the MTA‘s “overflowing, underfunded to-do list.” Instead, wrote the board, build the QueensWay and address commuter needs with dedicated bus lanes. 

The QueensWay. (Courtesy dlandstudio & WXY)

The QueensWay. (Courtesy dlandstudio & WXY)

Related Stories